
Corcoran and Sotheby’s are both owned by NRT which is intern owned by Realogy. Realogy has a booklet on the internet which defines its policy on “Fair Competion and Antitrust” as well as other lofty principals of Realogy for its employees.
Download The Code Here.
Here’s the text of the “Fair Competition and Antitrust” section:
We will vigorously compete, but do so fairly, complying with all laws protecting competition and the integrity of the marketplace. We will not enter into any formal or informal agreements or discussions with competitors about prices, marketing programs, or matters affecting price, services, sales territory, products, clients or suppliers. We will not take improper action in the marketplace pursuant to an agreement with a competitor.
We recognize that antitrust violations are serious criminal matters that can result in severe fines and jail terms. When we have any doubt as to what constitutes a competitive or antitrust matter, we will contact our Legal department.
I don’t think Reology is serious about its lofty pledge. Here’s why.
We send Sotheby’s President, Kathryn A. Korte a certified “Cease and Desist” letter demanding that Sotheby’s stop its use of O.R.E.X./RealNet which we believe is an illegal conspiracy with 24 of its competitors in restraint of trade.
Sotheby’s law firm, Stroock & Stroock & Lavan LLP wrote me a letter, denying everything but providing no detail with their letter.
The lawyer said:
We have reviewed the letter, as well as the document referenced in the letter. SIR categorically disagrees with the accusations that you make in both. SIR’s business practices, particularly its use of the O.R.E.X. system are perfectly lawful, and not in violation of the antitrust laws, or any other applicable laws.
There is no excuse for a Lawyer who writes such a disingenuous and grossly incomplete letter to me (Claude G. Szyfer).
- Do they claim that the O.R.E.X./RealNet distributes cobroke information in a fair way to all competitors?
- Do they claim that it is legal to pay 10 to 15 times the cost of running an equivalent MLS as prescribed by law?
- Do they claim that it is legal to allow any agent to “Un-check” the distribution of co-broke information to any agent at the will of the agent?
- Do they claim that it is legal for each subscriber to O.R.E.X./RealNet to have their own criteria for which agencies gets co-broke information?
- Do they claim that the bundling and predatory pricing by O.R.E.X./RealNet HREO.com is legal?
- Do they claim that it is legal for O.R.E.X./RealNet to charge widely varying prices for the same or similar service — even free service to certain agencies?
The questions are many, — no answers from Corcoran or Sotheby’s.
I think that Sotheby’s, Corcoran, and Realogy are not serious about:
“We recognize that antitrust violations are serious criminal matters that can result in severe fines and jail teims.”
Looks to me as if Realogy just wants to hide from the severe fines and jail terms — as in hiding under a rock.
Every agent at Sotheby’s and Corcoran should demand a full explanation out of their parent agency.
The law is clear that each agent, in spite of the actions of their agency, is responsible to comply with the “Go to Jail, big fines and damages” antitrust law.
Bank robbers can’t continue to rob banks, just because they make their living that way.
Posted on November 18th, 2008 by admin
Filed under: Corcoran, Law-breaking, RealNet/Orex, Sotheby's, What agents do | No Comments »
oth are subscribers to O.R.E.X./RealNet — a service which EastEndListings.com claims is operated as an illegal Antitrust conspiracy.
irty homes they have sold since Labor Day. The highest price is Susan Breitenbach’s exclusive for $13,950,000 in Amagansett. The lowest price is one in East Quogue for $429,900.



